 |
|
to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Kunkle v. State4/14/2005 es of itinerant employers are not prohibited from obtaining coverage under the act. Thus, it appears when the entire act is read as a whole, the employer's election not to obtain coverage is not determinative of whether the employee is entitled to benefits.
CONCLUSION
[ ] We hold that Mr. Kunkle's employment was principally located in Wyoming and, thus the act applied to his work-related injury. We reverse the district court's order and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Wyoming Employee Leasing Services
Employee Leasing Services
|
|
to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.
|
|