A comprehensive and easily accessible directory of Employee Leasing Services nationwide
help small business Attract and Retain quality employees by offering quality benefits through Employee Leasing Services
Foster an environment of fellowship and free exchange of ideas among member Employee Leasing Companies

  to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.

Continental Casualty Co. v. Mangum

8/11/2005



Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Rodriguez


Appellant, Continental Casualty Company ("CCC"), appeals from the trial court's judgment upholding a decision of the Texas Workers' Compensation Commission ("TWCC") in favor of appellee, Barry Mangum. We affirm.


Background


Mangum is a former employee of Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc. Stewart & Stevenson provided their employees with workers' compensation insurance from CCC. Mangum was employed as a mechanic on an assembly line with Stewart & Stevenson for over seven years, installing the brake and exhaust systems on trucks, which required the frequent use of pneumatic tools in repetitive motions.


Mangum began having problems with his hands in 1999. He first believed the pain and numbness in his hands was caused by poor circulation. He began reporting his problems to his doctor in November of 1999 and was initially diagnosed with arthritis and high blood pressure. During a return visit on December 2, 1999, his doctor found signs of possible carpal tunnel syndrome and referred Mangum to a second doctor. Mangum was examined by the second doctor on December 8; this doctor confirmed that Mangum was exhibiting symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome, told him to start wearing splints on his wrists, and began tests to verify that the problem was in fact carpal tunnel syndrome. The test results were analyzed on December 28 and found to be suggestive of carpal tunnel syndrome, although an official diagnosis was not made until March of 2000.


Mangum reported the doctor's findings to his employer on January 5, 2000. He continued to work until March 20, 2000, when he underwent wrist surgery to correct the injury. He was unable to resume working until May 8, 2000.


Mangum sought workers' compensation benefits for this period of unemployment following his surgery, which CCC contested. A hearing officer of the TWCC heard his case and determined that (1) Mangum had sustained a compensable occupational disease-related injury, (2) the date of the injury was December 8, 1999, and (3) CCC was responsible for paying Mangum workers' compensation benefits for his inability to work from March 20 to May 8.


CCC appealed the decision of the TWCC to the Wharton County district court, arguing that because Mangum was initially warned that he may be suffering from carpal tunnel syndrome on December 2, the date of his injury was December 2, not December 8. The date of the injury was a key issue in determining CCC's liability because an employee is required to report a work-related injury to his employer within thirty days in order to be eligible for benefits. See TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. ยง 409.001(a) (Vernon 1996). Mangum reported his injury to his supervisor on January 5, which was more than thirty days after the initial exam on December 2, but less than thirty days after the confirmation of his symptoms on December 8. Following a bench trial, the judge affirmed the findings of the TWCC, and CCC accordingly filed its appeal with this Court.


CCC now appeals in three issues: (1) the trial court erred in finding that Mangum should have known that he had carpal tunnel syndrome and that it was work-related as of December 8, because the evidence is factually insufficient to support the court's rulings; (2) the trial court erred in finding that Mangum should have known that he had carpal tunnel syndrome and that it was work-related as of December 8 because the evidence is legally insufficient to support the court's rulings; and (3) the trial court erred in finding that Mangum timely reported his work-related injury to his employer pursuant to section 409.001 because the e

Page 1 2 3 

Texas Employee Leasing Services    Employee Leasing Services


  to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.

Employee Leasing Who Is the Employer? Hiring/Firing Issues
Employee Leasing Advantage Employee Leasing Models Human Resources Management
Employee Handbooks American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Employers Practice Liability Insurance (EPL)
Employment Forms, Postings Sexual Harassment at workplace Employee Leasing vs. Temp
Administrative Services Organization (ASO) Human Resources Organization (HRO) Professional Employer Organization (PEO)
Payroll Services Human Resources Workers Compensation Codes
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Inquiries  |  Partner Websites
SiteMap  | Trading Partners  | Register  | Case LawsFAQ | Employee Leasing Forum | Employee Leasing Directory  | Success Stories
Terms of Service  Copyright © 2004. “Employee-Leasing.org ”. All rights reserved.