A comprehensive and easily accessible directory of Employee Leasing Services nationwide
help small business Attract and Retain quality employees by offering quality benefits through Employee Leasing Services
Foster an environment of fellowship and free exchange of ideas among member Employee Leasing Companies

  to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.

Johnson Controls Inc. v. Barkley

10/18/2005

Submitted: September 30, 2005


Before STEELE, Chief Justice, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices


ORDER


This 18th day of October 2005, upon consideration of the appellee's motion to dismiss and the appellants' response thereto, it appears to the Court that:


(1) In October 2004, plaintiff-appellee, Robert D. Barkley, filed a complaint in the Superior Court seeking damages from defendants-appellants, Johnson Controls, Inc., and its workers compensation insurance carriers, Kemper Insurance Group and American Motorists Insurance Co., for failure to timely pay workers compensation benefits. The parties subsequently filed cross motions for summary judgment in the Superior Court. The motions dealt solely with the issue of liability.


(2) On August 18, 2005, the Superior Court issued its decision, which granted Barkley's motion for summary judgment and denied the appellants' motion. In its decision, the Superior Court stated that an inquisition hearing on damages would be scheduled if the parties were not able to agree on the amount of damages owed.


(3) Under Delaware law, an order is deemed final and appealable if the trial court has clearly declared its intention that the order be the court's "final act" in disposing of all justiciable matters within its jurisdiction. In a suit for money damages, "settlement of the amount due is a condition precedent to the finality of a judgment." Thus, an appeal from a determination of liability only, where damages have not been fixed, constitutes an impermissible interlocutory appeal if the provisions of Supreme Court Rule 42, which governs interlocutory appeals, have not been observed. In this case, the appellant has not observed the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 42.


NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appellee's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. This appeal is DISMISSED.






Page 1 

Delaware Employee Leasing Services    Employee Leasing Services


  to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.

Employee Leasing Who Is the Employer? Hiring/Firing Issues
Employee Leasing Advantage Employee Leasing Models Human Resources Management
Employee Handbooks American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Employers Practice Liability Insurance (EPL)
Employment Forms, Postings Sexual Harassment at workplace Employee Leasing vs. Temp
Administrative Services Organization (ASO) Human Resources Organization (HRO) Professional Employer Organization (PEO)
Payroll Services Human Resources Workers Compensation Codes
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Inquiries  |  Partner Websites
SiteMap  | Trading Partners  | Register  | Case LawsFAQ | Employee Leasing Forum | Employee Leasing Directory  | Success Stories
Terms of Service  Copyright © 2004. “Employee-Leasing.org ”. All rights reserved.