A comprehensive and easily accessible directory of Employee Leasing Services nationwide
help small business Attract and Retain quality employees by offering quality benefits through Employee Leasing Services
Foster an environment of fellowship and free exchange of ideas among member Employee Leasing Companies

  to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.

IN RE McINTOSH

12/9/1994

This is an original attorney discipline proceeding filed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator against Michael R. McIntosh, of Kansas City, Kansas, an attorney admitted and licensed to practice law in the State of Kansas.


The facts may be summarized as follows:
COUNT I

Respondent arranged for one of his workers compensation clients to be evaluated by Rockhill Orthopaedics, P.C. David Tilema, M.D., performed the evaluation, and a $500 charge was incurred. The bill was not paid despite numerous requests and the passage of two and one-half years prior to the filing of the formal complaint.


COUNT II


Respondent ordered a copy of a November 1989 deposition he attended in California in connection with one of his pending cases. Despite numerous requests by the court reporter taking the deposition, respondent did not pay for the copy. In January 1993, judgment was entered by a California court against respondent in the amount of $719.79.


COUNT III


This count reflects the extensive efforts of the Disciplinary Administrator and an assigned local bar representative to investigate and resolve Counts I and II informally. Respondent, during these


contacts, never disputed that he owed the bills and made promises to satisfy these debts. Notwithstanding, the two bills were not paid by respondent until shortly before the formal hearing herein.


The panel concluded that respondent had violated Rule 207 (1993 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 170) in that "he has failed to assist the Disciplinary Administrator and the local bar association in the investigation of the complaints." As an aggravating factor, the panel noted that respondent had received two prior informal admonitions. The panel then recommended that censure be imposed and that the court should direct publication of such censure.


No exceptions have been filed to the report of the hearing panel.


Although the panel's findings would have supported conclusions that MRPC violations had occurred relative to Counts I and II, the panel's report made no conclusions of law as to those counts.


We accept the panel's findings, conclusions, and recommended discipline.


IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Michael R. McIntosh be censured for violation of Rule 207.


IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the costs of these proceedings be assessed to respondent and that this order be published in the official Kansas Reports.







Page 1 

Kansas Employee Leasing Services    Employee Leasing Services


  to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.

Employee Leasing Who Is the Employer? Hiring/Firing Issues
Employee Leasing Advantage Employee Leasing Models Human Resources Management
Employee Handbooks American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Employers Practice Liability Insurance (EPL)
Employment Forms, Postings Sexual Harassment at workplace Employee Leasing vs. Temp
Administrative Services Organization (ASO) Human Resources Organization (HRO) Professional Employer Organization (PEO)
Payroll Services Human Resources Workers Compensation Codes
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Inquiries  |  Partner Websites
SiteMap  | Trading Partners  | Register  | Case LawsFAQ | Employee Leasing Forum | Employee Leasing Directory  | Success Stories
Terms of Service  Copyright © 2004. “Employee-Leasing.org ”. All rights reserved.