 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Sahara Hotel & Casino v. Holden2/26/1998
In this workers' compensation case, Patricia Holden developed a debilitating condition in her left hand as a result of her employment at the Sahara Hotel and Casino ("the Sahara"). Ms. Holden also suffered from a number of other serious ailments, not attributable to her employment, which eventually led to her residence in a nursing home. The Sahara, a self-insured employer, paid Ms. Holden some workers' compensation benefits, but rejected her claim for retroactive temporary total disability benefits and offered her an apportioned permanent partial disability benefit. Ms. Holden appealed to the State Industrial Insurance System ("SIIS"). During the course of litigating her claims before the Department of Administration ("The Department") hearing officer, Ms. Holden died as a result of her non-industrial-related ailments. Although Ms. Holden left no dependents, her heirs continued to litigate her claims in her name.
The Department, which was unaware of Ms. Holden's death, rejected her contested claims on their merits, and Ms. Holden's heirs appealed to the district court for judicial review. The Sahara filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that Ms. Holden's non-dependent heirs have no legal basis to succeed to her workers' compensation claim and that her claim is therefore moot. The district court rejected the motion to dismiss and reversed the decision of the Department, thereby, in effect, ordering the payment of workers' compensation benefits to Ms. Holden's non-dependent heirs. The Sahara contends that this was error. We agree.
The workers' compensation laws were enacted as a humanitarian measure designed to protect injured persons and those dependent upon a deceased worker's income. See generally, Industrial Commission v. Peck, 69 Nev. 1, 10-11, 239 P.2d 244, 248 (1952). In fact, the word "compensation" is defined in the workers' compensation statutes as "the money which is payable to an employee or to his dependents." NRS 616A.090. (Emphasis added.) In light of the recognized purpose of the workers' compensation scheme stated above, and the absence of any express language creating a right of survivorship in favor of non-dependent heirs, we see no reason to deviate from a literal construction of the definition of "compensation" provided by the legislature. Authorization for the payment of workers' compensation benefits to non-dependent persons must come from the legislature and not from this court.
Because there is no longer an authorized beneficiary to whom Ms. Holden's workers' compensation benefits may be paid, we vacate the order of the district court.
Springer, C.J.
Shearing, J.
Rose, J.
Young, J.
Maupin, J.
Page 1 Nevada Employee Leasing Services
Employee Leasing Services
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.
|
|