 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State ex rel. Volker v. Indus. Comm.5/15/1996
[Cite as State ex rel. Volker v. Indus. Comm. (1996), ____ Ohio St.3d ___.]
Workers' compensation -- Industrial Commission's denial of application for additional compensation alleging violation of a specific safety requirement not an abuse of discretion, when -- Interpretation of a specific safety requirement is within sound discretion of commission.
Submitted March 5, 1996
Appellant-claimant, Paul J. Volker, was employed by appellee Rego Berea Supermarkets, Inc. (a.k.a. Riser Foods, Inc.). On September 1, 1989, he went to the back room to get meat trays that were stored on a shelf approximately nine and one-half feet above the floor.
The storeroom contained a ten-foot wooden stepladder. Claimant alleged that the storeroom floor was so crowded with stock that the ladder could not be opened into an A-frame position. As such, he propped the closed ladder against the shelf and climbed up to get the trays. When claimant reached near the top, the ladder slipped out from underneath him.
A workers' compensation claim was allowed for a fractured heel. In late 1990, claimant moved appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio for additional compensation, alleging that his employer violated a specific safety requirement ("VSSR")--Ohio Adm. Code 4121:1-5-03(C)(2)(b)(i). A commission staff hearing officer denied claimant's application, writing:
"Claimant cited rule 4121:1-5-03(C)(2)(b)(i). This rule states that, `All portable ladders shall be equipped with safety shoes, metal spikes or spurs. Safety shoes shall be surfaced with cork, carborundum, rubber or other material with equivalent coefficient of friction.' "Based on a review of the evidence presented, it is concluded that part of the feet of this ladder had been cut off and the ladder did not have safety shoes, metal spikes, or spurs. "Even though this ladder did not have the required safety shoes, metal spikes or spurs, it is ruled that no violation of this rule occurred because this ladder falls within the definition of 4121:1-5-03(C)(2)(b)(ii), which states that the requirements of part (i) do not apply to stepladders, lashed ladders or hook ladders. "Under 4121:1-5-01(B)(80)(k), a stepladder is defined as `a self-supporting portable ladder, non-adjustable in length, having flat steps or treads, and a hinged back. Its size is designated by the overall length of the ladder measured along the front edge of the side.' "The ladder at issue would meet this definition because it was a portable ladder which was non-adjustable in length (it was not an extension ladder) and it had flat steps or treads, and a hinged back. "Because this ladder meets the definition of a stepladder it would be specifically exempted from the requirements of 4121:1-5-03(C)(2)(b)(i). Therefore, no violation of this rule is found."
Reconsideration was denied.
Claimant filed a complaint in mandamus in the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, alleging that the commission abused its discretion in denying a VSSR. The appellate court denied the writ.
This cause is now before this court upon an appeal as of right.
Ohio Adm. Code 4121:1-5-03(C)(2)(b) reads:
"(i) All portable ladders shall be equipped with safety shoes, metal spikes or spurs. Safety shoes shall be surfaced with cork, carborundum, rubber or other material with equivalent coefficient of friction. "(ii) This does not apply to step ladders, lashed ladders or hook ladders."
Ohio Adm. Code 4121:1-5-01(B)(80)(k) defines "stepladder" as:
"* * * self-supporting portable ladder, non-adjustable in length, having flat steps or treads, and a hinged back. Its size is designated by
Page 1 2 Ohio Employee Leasing Services
Employee Leasing Services
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.
|
|