 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Campbell v. City of Tullahoma9/1/2000
Mailed July 26, 2000
The appellant, Campbell, insists the trial court erred in granting the appellee's motion for discretionary costs because no equitable ground for such relief was asserted in the motion and accompanying affidavit. The panel concludes that the plaintiff's voluntary dismissal of her complaint is a sufficient ground for an award of discretionary costs.
Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-225(e) (1999) Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Circuit Court affirmed.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed.
The claimant, Patricia M. Campbell, initiated this civil action against the defendants, City of Tullahoma and American International Underwriters, for workers' compensation benefits, on March 20, 1998. The defendants, by their answer, denied all material averments of the complaint and an amended complaint later filed by consent. On April 8, 1999, the claimant served a notice of voluntary dismissal. The trial judge signed an Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice on April 15, 1999.
The defendants then made a timely motion for an award of discretionary costs, accompanied by an affidavit that they had incurred court reporter's fees of $1,130.75 for the taking of four depositions. The motion was also accompanied by invoices from the court reporter. The motion said:
"Comes now the Defendants, City of Tullahoma and American International Underwriters, Inc., pursuant to Rule 54.04 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure, and moves this Honorable Court to award discretionary costs to the Defendants in this action. In support of this Motion, the Defendants attach the Affidavit of Frank Thomas setting out the allowable discretionary costs which are being claimed in this action. This action was originally filed on March 20, 1998. A Notice of Voluntary Dismissal/Non-suit was filed on April 8, 1999. Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 54.04 allows discretionary costs to be awarded a party in the event of a voluntary dismissal."
The trial judge granted the motion. The appellant, relying on Depriest v. 1717-19 West End Associates, 951 S.W.2d 769 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997), contends the trial court erred by allowing discretionary costs because the affidavit in support of the motion did not state equitable grounds for such relief. Since there is no factual dispute, appellate review is de novo without any presumption of correctness. Presley v. Bennett, 860 S.W.2d 857 (Tenn. 1993).
Tenn. R. Civ. P. 54.04(2) provides as follows:
"(2) Costs not included in the bill of costs prepared by the clerk are allowable only in the court's discretion.
Discretionary costs allowable are: reasonable and necessary court reporter expenses for depositions or trials, reasonable and necessary expert witness fees for depositions or trials, and guardian ad litem fees; travel expenses are not allowable discretionary costs. Subject to Rule 41.04, a party requesting discretionary costs shall file and serve a motion within thirty (30) days after entry of judgment. The trial court retains jurisdiction over a motion for discretionary costs even though a party has filed a notice of appeal. The court may tax discretionary costs at the time of voluntary dismissal." (Emphasis supplied).
In Depreist, the Court of Appeals reversed an award of discretionary costs because the motion was unsu
Page 1 2 Tennessee Employee Leasing Services
Employee Leasing Services
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.
|
|