A comprehensive and easily accessible directory of Employee Leasing Services nationwide
help small business Attract and Retain quality employees by offering quality benefits through Employee Leasing Services
Foster an environment of fellowship and free exchange of ideas among member Employee Leasing Companies

  to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.

Hulsey v. Peterbilt Motors Co.

8/17/2000

Mailed - July 17, 2000


This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. In this case, the employer contends that the award of permanent partial disability benefits is excessive. The employee asserts that the appeal is frivolous. The panel has concluded the award should be affirmed and no damages should be awarded for a frivolous appeal.


Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-225(e)(3) Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Circuit Court Affirmed


Turnbull, Sp. J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which Drowota, J., and Loser, Sp. J. joined.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Background


The employee Claudean Hulsey, is 52 years old. She left high school during the 11th grade and has had no further school or vocational training. Her job experience is limited to occupations requiring repetitive use of her hands. She began to work for Peterbilt Motors Company in February of 1984. For the past 10 years, Hulsey worked in the "hood/box" department where she installed cloth and vinyl lining into sleeper boxes using impact air screwdrivers and power drills. Her work required forceful repetitive hand intensive activities.


In 1996, Hulsey began experiencing numbness and pain in her right arm, symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. She then began to be treated by Dr. Michael McHugh. In April of 1998, Dr. McHugh performed a right sided carpal tunnel release. Hulsey returned to work with restrictions from Dr. McHugh for a week or two following the surgery.


Peterbilt employees went on strike for seven months during the summer and fall of 1998 before Hulsey had a full work trial. In December of 1998, Hulsey returned to work in the "hood/box" department. She began experiencing pain and tingling in her hand again and returned to Dr. McHugh in April of 1999. Dr. McHugh diagnosed her with DeQuervains Tenosynovitis, right hand lateral column pain and possible early recurrence of right carpal tunnel syndrome.


Dr. McHugh placed permanent restrictions on Hulsey. She is to use impact tools no more than 4 hours in the course of the day, do only occasional gripping or squeezing, and only occasional strenuous pushing or pulling. Hulsey now has accommodated lighter duties but continues to experience pain in her right wrist at work. She lines sleeper boxes four hours per day and drives a tractor pulling truck hoods off the paint line for the remainder of her shift. Dr. McHugh assigned a 5% impairment to the upper right extremity. Dr. David W. Gaw, who examined Husley once in 1998, assigned a 10% impairment of the upper right extremity, and applied similar restrictions.


The trial judge found that the employee had a 40% vocational disability to the right upper extremity after crediting the impairment rating given by Dr. Gaw.


Analysis


Percentage of Disability


Our analysis begins by recognizing the applicable standard by which to review worker's compensation cases. Issues of fact are reviewed de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption that the findings of the trial court are correct, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. E.g., McIlvain -v- Russell Stover Candies, Inc., 996 S.W.2d 179, 183 (Tenn. 1999) When a trial court has seen and heard witnesses, especially where issues of credibility and weight of oral testimony are involved, considerable deference must be accorded the trial court's factual findings. E.g., Collins -v- Howmet Corp., 970 S.W.2d 941, 943 (Tenn. 1998) Where medical

Page 1 2 

Tennessee Employee Leasing Services    Employee Leasing Services


  to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.

Employee Leasing Who Is the Employer? Hiring/Firing Issues
Employee Leasing Advantage Employee Leasing Models Human Resources Management
Employee Handbooks American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Employers Practice Liability Insurance (EPL)
Employment Forms, Postings Sexual Harassment at workplace Employee Leasing vs. Temp
Administrative Services Organization (ASO) Human Resources Organization (HRO) Professional Employer Organization (PEO)
Payroll Services Human Resources Workers Compensation Codes
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Inquiries  |  Partner Websites
SiteMap  | Trading Partners  | Register  | Case LawsFAQ | Employee Leasing Forum | Employee Leasing Directory  | Success Stories
Terms of Service  Copyright © 2004. “Employee-Leasing.org ”. All rights reserved.