 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Hannah v. Hannah8/11/2000
rd before the court. As the proponent of the request for support, it was Hebern's burden to demonstrate need, and he was unable to do that. We cannot find that the court abused its discretion in rejecting his request.
The second assignment of error is overruled.
THIRD ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR
THE TRIAL COURT'S DISPROPORTIONATE AWARD OF PERSONAL PROPERTY TO APPELLEE IS ARBITRARY, CAPRICIOUS AND INEQUITABLE.
Hebern argues that the trial court abused its discretion when it divided the parties' household goods by awarding Royetta every article she had asked for. He contends that because he was allowed to retain the marital residence by purchasing Royetta's interest, his needs for the larger items in particular are manifest and the division he proposed "would be more appropriate." (Brief, p. 15).
Again, we do not review this issue de novo but on an abuse of discretion standard. We find no abuse of discretion.
The third assignment of error is overruled.
Conclusion
Having overruled the assignments of error presented, we will affirm the judgment from which this appeal was taken.
BROGAN, J. and FAIN, J., concur.
Page 1 2 3 Ohio Employee Leasing Services
Employee Leasing Services
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.
|
|