 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Employee Leasing Services in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State ex. rel Turner v. Industrial Commission of Ohio8/2/2000
condition here. See State ex rel. Peabody Coal Co. v. Indus. Comm. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 639, 614 N.E.2d 1044. The second is our prohibition against implicit recognition of a medical condition in State Insurance Fund claims, and such recognition would be needed to allow reactivation here. State ex rel. Williams v. Indus. Comm. (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 240, 11 OBR 553, 465 N.E.2d 80. We find, therefore, that the commission did not abuse its discretion in this regard.
Claimant raises last a proposition challenging the sufficiency of a particular medical report. Since the commission did not rely on that report, it is irrelevant to this case and is not discussed.
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
|